dog food holistic ranked rated top 20

dog food holistic ranked rated top 20

dog food holistic ranked rated top 20 Info

When a dog sits he's more attentive, making it easier to follow commands.When the dog is in position, praise lavishly even though you executed the movement not the dog. Follow those futile techniques and you'll harvest the pay back of a neurotic dog and you will be an unhappy owner. And never let him train you.Encourage by taking a treat or toy. Hold off on food treats until you really need them. With repetition comes understanding.First, take advantage of the dog's spontaneous behavior. At completion praise lavishly and reward. Every behavior should be associated with a unique hand gesture that you don't otherwise use. Associate a unique hand signal and tone with the command.In really hard cases, kneel nd put the leash loop under one foot and slide it under the knee of the opposite leg, facing at a slight angle to the dog. Just dont EVER do it. Never reward until the behavior is complete - Also don't become tense or angry after failure. But that's reserved in the wild for only the most severe circumstances. Be patient, clear and consistent. Simultaneously, gently take both the dog's forelegs and pull toward you, issuing the voice command.Part of that patience means keeping your temper when you would like to lash out physically.With a treat or toy, face the dog and place it above his head and slightly behind the forehead, but still visible. Fortunately, almost every dog can learn 'sit' quickly. It seems it should be obvious - they've done the action with success many times before - but today they are just 'being obstinate'. Dog Training - How NOT To Train Your DogJust about every dog owner truly wants to train their dog well. When you see it give a unique voice command and hand gesture pair. Try to be away from other voices. Pull the leash loop with your foot, sliding it over your leg. For the slow learner or assertive dog, it may be necessary to use a collar and short leash - two to four feet is best - 'Sit' the dog and kneel down facing him.Repetition, consistency (reward only for the proper action), and enthusiasm will quickly lead to learning the 'sit'. Talk to them like they were a human child. Don't be harsh, but don't give up easily either. "Site" the dog then move the treat to the ground just in front of the nose.After several repetitions try just using a 'waving down' hand movement, palm toward the floor or ground. Praise the dog lavishly.Lets get one thing carved in stone right away - Dogs are not hairy fluffy kids. You want the dog to associate the position with good feelings - his and yours.Patience and commitment is key to training any behavior. Punish them for not behaving the way you want.- Get impatient and frustrated when they don't behave as you want them to. Physical punishment just isn't an effective training technique.Dog Training - Sit Command - Few behaviors are as fundamentally important as 'sit'. As important is what he is not doing! In a sit dogs can't chase cats, knock over furniture, run into the street. That way a dog associates the behavior with the command.It also has practical benefits. When the dog starts to sit, give the command and signal. Many dogs take two years to learn anything beyond the easiest basics to the point that it consistently sticks.Dog Training - Down Command - Dogs have a natural inclination

Wikipedia on dog breeds

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Films . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces . To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

--Jamdav86 09:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Just for the record, WP:CVG is standardizing on an 80% width for bottom-of-the-page navboxes, but that's just a spitballed number that ends up looking nice on the page. Occasionally there will be some overlap between CVG and CMC pages; 80% isn't bad as arbitrary numbers go. - A Man In Bl♟ck 09:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

You pretty much have to pick an arbitrary number and stick with it. Case-by-case sizes look ugly when you have multiple boxes, and no single number is going to look perfect in every case. - A Man In Bl♟ck 05:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

(restarting indent)

Sounds like the three main values under discussion are: 80%; 95%; and 100%.

What are the pros and cons of each? (and are there other values that should be discussed? - jc37 02:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Blank line

As you can see, there is a blank line between template 1 and 2 but no blank line between template 2 and 3.

I thought it would be better for consistency that there is a blank between all of them or no blank line at all. I would prefer that there is no blank line.

I didn’t thought that a discussion is necessary for such a minor change but my edit was reverted without explanation so perhaps it is necessary. --Lasttan 18:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I did it because this template was the only one with a blank line. (see also all other templates of Superman and DC) --Lasttan 19:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

...Batutsi

I must agree that the Batutsi does not seem best suited to the main Batman box. Would it be possible to put it in some for of "Miscelania" section of the "Batman in popular media" template? Reading the article, a case could be made for its pop-culture relevance.D1Puck1T 06:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I believe the key phrase there was "of the batttman series" (sic). This dance only relates to the series, not to the entirety of the character's history (which has spanned decades of comics, animated series and several movies). In addition adding this item creates an unattractive extra line at the bottom of the template box, which adds unnecessary length to a great many articles it's attached to. -Markeer 13:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Font size

How about changing the font size a bit? On my screen (1280x960 res on 19" CRT) I can hardly read the various items. What I can read rather clearly are the links to pages outside of wikipedia which are set in a different font style. I think increasing the fontsize by one or two would benefit readability. Opinions anyone? Madcynic 16:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Recent Additions (Discuss Ongoing Changes)

I've reverted a few recent additions to the template, specifically Damien Wayne, Azrael and Renee Montoya. No prejudice against the editors who added these (or the characters themselves) but previous consensus regarding this template was to try to keep it as simple as possible, stressing characters (whether supporting, allies or villains) that have had either an extremely long and notable impact on the Batman character/universe, or which have had crossover mass appeal by being featured both in comics and the large hollywood movies (i.e. characters extremely familiar to thousands or millions of people who will never read a comic book).

In my opinion, none of the three characters I've reverted match either of those criteria, as all three are relative to the 75+ years of Batman's history, extremely recent characters, not even taking into account that they have no crossover mass market appearances that I'm aware of.

However this is my opinion, so I'm starting a new conversation thread here to see how other editors feel about the scope of this template, what characters (if any) should be added or removed going forward, and what is the best criteria to use in judging any such thing on a case by case basis. -Markeer 16:32, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

But you're including Harvey Bullock... he's hardly got a larger role or greater significance in the Batman universe than Renee Montoya (who has now even become the second incarnation of The Question). Deerlike (talk) 03:40, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Straw poll concerning inclusion of Damian

• Delete Damian from the template. We cannot know what Damian's lasting impact will be and we are not supposed to guess about such things (see WP:CRYSTAL). He is, at best, a recurring character. He is not a supporting character. Too many other characters who appear far more often than he has are excluded from the template. Doczilla 19:47, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• delete Damian. - as above. 66.109.248.114 22:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
• keep him He is important now. If he loses importance later he can be removed then 24.164.136.207 20:58, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Damian per my comments in the previous subsection of this talk page -Markeer 15:13, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Leave off - There is already a link to Batman supporting characters, where he and a myriad of other characters are. I see no need for him to be directly in the navbox. At this time, simply not comparable to the Joker, for example. - jc37 15:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep him - as above.--César (talk) 21:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Group Placement for Characters

Hello.

I recently changed the groups that both Catwoman and The Riddler are listed under from villains to supporting cast, as neither Catwoman nor The Riddler act as villains anymore. The way I see it, if Man-Bat and Red Robin can be included in this group, then so should Catwoman and The Riddler.

Now, the change I made for The Riddler I suppose could be contentious, but I really think Catwoman should not be listed as a villain. She hasn't acted in that capacity in years.

Just thought I'd ask if these changes are okay. (Droorogers (talk) 16:29, 18 March 2008 (UTC))

Comics titles

Since Batman is a comics character, why isn't there a section on the MAIN titles he appears in? A tiny link buried at the bottom isn't good enough, because it's quite an integral thing to the character. Surely. ntnon (talk) 18:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Current "look"

My major concern with the current look is the large amount of whitespace on the right side, which adds to the overall size without corresponding content (a major issue with a box at the bottom of so many pages). That said, I have no problem with "Batman" and "Detective Comics" being in the navbox, although I also have no problem with the general link to the List of Batman Titles either. No more than two overall links though please, as this is a cross-media character, not just a comics character. -Markeer 13:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

I agree with your paring down the villains, but I think you went a little too far..! So I took the liberty of re-insterting Freeze and Ivy (easily on a par with Ra's), as well as making sure that Catwoman wasn't missed. She's clearly switched about a lot, but should be under Villains before Family. But should also be under family, hence the tautological addition. Likewise, I think it utterly crucial to include a "more" after the Supporting cast and Villains, because that's the way the eye is drawn, and not everyone will think that the left-link will be a page, rather than a category. That's my experience and logic, anyway. ;o)

Still think JPV has no business being listed as, ostensibly, equal to Wayne and NOT as Azrael, and that "Alternate versions" should be appended with the See also after "other media," but since those may be more controversial, I've left them be. ntnon (talk) 02:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

League of Assassins

• League of Assassins
• Lady Shiva
• Bronze Tiger (and maybe even Richard Dragon)

These are clearly Batman-related articles.

The LoA is so obvious that it could honestly be added without a need for discussion.

Lady Shiva is now known to be the mother of Cassanrda Cain, was one of those interrogated as to whether she was Jason's mother, and has been mostly appearing in bat-boks almost exclusively.

Bronze Tiger killed the first Batwoman. (While not so certain in the current chronology, they've been hinting at another previous Batwoman, lately).

Richard Dragon to a lesser extent only through his interaction with the other two characters, and because he's now noted to have been one of those who trained Bruce Wayne.

Thoughts? - jc37 19:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

dog food holistic ranked rated top 20 Views

dog breeds Roundup

Good luck with your .