dog black labrador painting portraits

dog black labrador painting portraits

dog breeds References

To command sit, stand and face the dog then make the command. So, here's how NOT to train your dog:- Forget that your dog has a nature unlike yours. When you see it give a unique voice command and hand gesture pair.- Get impatient and frustrated when they don't behave as you want them to. You want the dog to associate the position with good feelings - his and yours. Be patient, clear and consistent. Never reward until the behavior is complete - Also don't become tense or angry after failure.Repetition, consistency (reward only for the proper action), and enthusiasm will quickly lead to learning the 'sit'. But that's reserved in the wild for only the most severe circumstances.It also has practical benefits. Now bring out other techniques. So, the dog hasn't evolved to understand why you're hitting them. Fortunately, almost every dog can learn 'sit' quickly.At first the dog will have no idea why you're so happy. Physical punishment just isn't an effective training technique. The result is often a common catalogue of errors that can be, with more or less effort, headed off before they begin.Make the hand gesture, issue the voice command and move a treat or toy from the dog's chin to the ground while pulling gently on the leash. Many dogs take two years to learn anything beyond the easiest basics to the point that it consistently sticks. It instills fear, not trust. When the behavior is complete, praise lavishly. Associate a unique hand signal and tone with the command. It's easy to use physical punishment as the first route of correcting a dog's behavior. When the dog starts to sit, give the command and signal. There are alternate explanations for their behavior. It also leads to behaviors like 'rollover' and 'crawl'.When a dog sits he's more attentive, making

Wikipedia on dog training

Step 2.5 - Transclude and link

Transclude the newly created subpage to the Featured picture candidate list (direct link).

Step 3 - Update image

On the nominated image's page use the 'Edit page' button to add the fpc template like so: {{FPC|title}} . This inserts the featured pictures candidate template, to let the original contributor and other interested parties know that the image is up for voting.

Too complicated?

If you are unable to follow the above procedure, add your image to Wikipedia:Picture peer review following the simpler instructions provided there. You can mention that you would like to submit it to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates , but that you don't know how. If someone else deems it suitable, they will add it to FPC on your behalf. Alternatively you can request a regular FPC or PPR editor to submit an image on your behalf by contacting them on their talkpage.

How to comment

• If you approve of a picture, write Support followed by your reasons.
• If you oppose a nomination, write Oppose followed by your reasons. All objections should be accompanied by a specific rationale that, if addressed, would make you support the image.
• If you think a nominated image obviously fails the featured picture criteria, write Speedy close followed by your reasons. Nominations may be closed early if this is the case.
  • To change your opinion, strike it out (with <s>...</s> ) rather than removing it.

Recommendations added early in the process may be disregarded if they do not address concerns and/or improvements that arise later in the debate. Reviewers are advised to monitor the progress of a nomination and update their votes accordingly.

Prior to giving an opinion, the image should be assessed on its quality as displayed at full size (high-resolution) in an image editing program. Please note that the images are only displayed at thumbnail size on this page. The thumbnail links to the image description page which, in turn, links to the high-resolution version.

Please remember to be civil, not to bite the newbies and to comment on the image, not the person.

Editing candidates

If you feel you could improve a candidate by image editing, please feel free to do so, but do not overwrite or remove the original. Instead, upload your edit with a different file name (e.g. add "edit" to the file name), and display it below the original nomination. Edits should be appropriately captioned in sequential order (eg, Edit 1, Edit 2, etc), and describe the modifications that have been applied.

Is my monitor calibrated correctly?

In a discussion about the brightness of an image, it is necessary to know if the computer display is properly adjusted. Displays differ greatly in their ability to show shadow detail. There are four dark grey circles in the adjacent image. If you can discern three (or even four) of the circles, your monitor can display shadow detail correctly. If you see fewer than three circles, you may need to adjust the monitor and/or computer display settings. Some displays cannot be adjusted for ideal shadow detail. Please take this into account when voting.

On a gamma-adjusted display, the four circles in the color image blend into the background when seen from a few feet away. If they do not, you could adjust the gamma setting (found in the computer's settings, not on the display), until they do. This may be very difficult to attain, and a slight error is not detrimental. Uncorrected PC displays usually show the circles darker than the background.

Note that on a LCD display (laptop or flat screen) the viewing angle strongly affects these images. Click on the images for more technical info.

Current nominations

Female Galah Outside Nest

• Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 09:08, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Uluguru Mountains Panorama

• Support as nominator -- Muhammad 07:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose Unappealing composition - it feels severely cut off at the bottom. For this reason, showing so little of the surroundings, enc is also low. --Janke | Talk 08:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Compact-Flourescent-Bulb

• Support as nominator -- The Talking Sock 22:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose well composed, but a bit small. Circumstances should be possible to duplicate at higher resolution. Please try again. :) Durova ^Charge! 23:42, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
• I would support but it's too small so Reluctant oppose . Intothewoods29 (talk) 03:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose Rather low enc, little or no "wow" - a larger size actually wouldn't bring out more detail... --Janke | Talk 08:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Bennett Place

• Support as nominator --Specious (talk) 21:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose No wow, weak technical quality at full resolution. Sorry. —αἰτίας • discussion • 22:37, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
• Comment might make a good candidate for the Valued Image program at Commons. Durova ^Charge! 23:40, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

George Washington's first State of the Union Address

• Support as nominator -- Durova ^Charge! 20:49, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
• Comment It is a really great image, but i'm not thrilled about the fact it is a .djvu. I think that most users, like myself, will come across this image, and not know how to view the full res, or how to properly save and open the file. The same could be said of a pdf file, but that is more of the standard and most users know how to deal with such a format. Is there a specific reason why this is in djvu format? smooth0 ⁷ 0 ₇ (talk) 01:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Yes. It was originally researched and uploaded as a request from Wikisource to illustrate featured content of theirs. Durova ^Charge! 02:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
• Oppose Needs to be in a more common format, so we can fix the annoying tilt... ;-) --Janke | Talk 07:28, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Charlie Sheen

dog food Info

dog food Info

Come back soon for more about .